That nothing in this act contained shall be so construed to affect the right and power of Congress to grant the right of way through any lands granted to an Indian, or a tribe of Indians, for railroads or other highways, or telegraph lines, for the public use, or condemn such lands to public uses, upon making just compensation. What conclusion can be drawn from this excerpt?

Native Americans were interested in linking their lands to other regions.

The federal government planned improvements to Native American lands.

The federal government maintained some power over Native American land.

Native American ownership of the land could not be refuted under any circumstance.

The answer would be that Native American ownership of the land could not be refuted under any circumstance.

This act is placing limits on the federal government, saying that they can't just take land away from Native Americans.

Answer Link

alinakincsem alinakincsem · Answer 2 · 2019-01-12T10:17:07+01:00

Answer:

The correct answer is: The federal government maintained some power over Native American land.

Explanation:

This excerpt is taken from the Dawes Act SEC. 10 which focuses on the ownership of the land.

A legislation which was passed in the late 19th century was named as The Dawes Act. This law aimed to distribute some piece of land to the Native Americans hoping that they would assimilate into an American society.

Therefore, 'The federal government maintained some power over Native American land' is the best conclusion that can drawn from the given excerpt.